Hi,

as I wrote before, I have an older version. I used the kernel version of that 
one to start up my new meta-ivi build. It crashed later with a kernel panic, 
but at least the kernel is running.

After that I compared the two kernel version I have, with mkimage -l.

1. Kernel version that is working quite well:

mkimage -l uImage
Image Name:   Linux-3.1.0
Created:      Fri Sep 21 11:25:32 2012
Image Type:   ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed)
Data Size:    4144744 Bytes = 4047.60 kB = 3.95 MB
Load Address: 80008000
Entry Point:  80008000

2. Kernel version that fails after uncompression:

mkimage -l uImage
Image Name:   Linux-3.1.0
Created:      Thu Sep 27 07:07:25 2012
Image Type:   ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed)
Data Size:    4176432 Bytes = 4078.55 kB = 3.98 MB
Load Address: 80008000
Entry Point:  80008000

I don't see any major issues here, so I guess I need to check the toolchain as 
proposed by Enrico.

Christian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Enrico
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 14:07
An: Schulenberg Christian, EI-42
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [meta-ti] pandaboard not booting

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:16 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm using the same kernel version as I did before. It's the default kernel 
> 3.1 as configured in the meta-ti layer: ti-ubuntu-3.1.0-1282.11, Revision: 
> a5c60c099296fcfc0c8fa8085c40883971486512
>
> Do you really think it makes sense to switch to a more recent one?

No, but i have no better ideas right now...

You could check if it's a known toolchain bug with that kernel, but i
think it would be faster to try a newer kernel (from the same
repository, ti ubuntu integration).

Enrico
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

Reply via email to