On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Enrico <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:15:55PM +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: >>> i don't think there should be any valid reason to continue with this >>> old kernel. first there isn't anyone who maintains that branch (my >>> team maintains that evil vendor tree). For Panda I would either >>> recommend to use to a more recent branch (like 3.4), in fact we might >>> even consider >>> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/working/ti/kernel.git >>> (branch tilt-3.4) as this is the base for our 'ubuntu' derived branch. >>> in fact for Panda, just mainline might be another option too.. >> >> Thanks, Nicolas! >> >> I'll give it a try with either of those trees and update the recipe >> accordingly. > > Using linaro tilt kernel could be useful to add support for gst-ducati > and friends more easily (using the dce firmware from their repository > instead of building it from sources). >
that's definitely what I had in mind too... > Enrico _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
