Hi, thanks for the hint to use kernel 3.4.
I updated my meta-ti layer to use kernel 3.4.11 and it works fine for me now. I tested this with gcc 4.7.1 as well as gcc 4.6.3 Bets regards, Christian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nicolas Dechesne [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Freitag, 28. September 2012 13:54 An: Schulenberg Christian, EI-42 Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Betreff: Re: [meta-ti] pandaboard not booting On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 1:03 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > could you give me some advice, what kernel version of 3.4.x to try? Or do you > have an idea, when a recipe for a more recent kernel could be available? http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/working/ti/kernel.git branch: tilt-3.4 config: omap4plus_defconfig > > BR, > Christian > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Denys Dmytriyenko > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 23:29 > An: Nicolas Dechesne > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [meta-ti] pandaboard not booting > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:15:55PM +0200, Nicolas Dechesne wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Gary Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I build the Panda kernel (based on the latest TI/Ubuntu tree >> > ti-ubuntu-3.4-1485.7 branch) >> > all the time with the Yocto toolchain & it works just fine. >> > >> > I also tried the off-the-shelf 3.1.0 which worked as well. >> > >> > There must be something odd about the 3.1 kernel built from the >> > linux-omap4-3.1.0 >> > recipe which is the default when built using Yocto+meta-ti >> >> i don't think there should be any valid reason to continue with this >> old kernel. first there isn't anyone who maintains that branch (my >> team maintains that evil vendor tree). For Panda I would either >> recommend to use to a more recent branch (like 3.4), in fact we might >> even consider >> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=landing-teams/working/ti/kernel.git >> (branch tilt-3.4) as this is the base for our 'ubuntu' derived branch. >> in fact for Panda, just mainline might be another option too.. > > Thanks, Nicolas! > > I'll give it a try with either of those trees and update the recipe > accordingly. > > -- > Denys > _______________________________________________ > meta-ti mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
