On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Nicolas Dechesne <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Enrico <[email protected]> wrote: >>> i would expect that it might be cleaner to archive the patch series, >>> than changing the SCR_URI... that's just my guess. >> >> Last time i tried this i noticed that the patch list was huge so it >> was easier to just use that tree. I don't know what's the status now >> but from a quick view it seems the same now. > > it is certainly easier... now if the goal is to have that patch merged > in meta-ti, the easier might not be the right one... > > i will let meta-ti maintainers chime in.
I think it depends more on what is the plan with that "forks": if they are being submitted upstream and the patch list will get smaller over time than i agree with you. But last time i played with gst-ducati was about one year ago and those "forks" are still there.... If i have time i will try to investigate more on this and generate a diff to have real numbers (if somebody else doesn't already know that). Enrico _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
