Hi,

On 12 October 2012 06:28, Tomas Frydrych <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/10/12 20:16, Nicolas Dechesne wrote:
>> unfortunately, the provision for that isn't really there, since the
>> gstreamer recipes don't have the 'x.y' in the name. was that discussed
>> anywhere? could we ensure that gst1.0 comes as
>> 'gstreamer1.0_1.0.0.bb'?
>
> I don't think there is anything at all gained by supporting
> simultaneously installing two versions of gstreamer; it makes no real
> sense on distro level. More so adding a version into a package name
> creates a world of pain and dependency hell. Would it not be enough to
> have _0.10 and _1.0 recipes alongside each other, one of which would
> have DEFAULT_PRIORITY=-1; a distro then can choose an appropriate
> version as it wants to?

Well, given that all the client and plugin code both needs to be
explicitly ported from 0.10 to 1.0, I don't see the problem tbh.  And
it is explicitly designed to be parallel-installable out of the box,
so yeah, my recipes allow for that.

I'm only passing through quickly today, but will share them when I get back.

Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti

Reply via email to