On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:38:03PM -0500, Carlos Hernandez wrote: > On 02/26/2013 03:26 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On 02/26/2013 03:12 PM, Cyril Chemparathy wrote: > >>On 02/26/2013 02:53 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote: > >>>+ Cyril, > >>> > >>>Cyril had worked on adding GPH format for u-boot. Want to hear from him > >>>why not used the u-boot-with-spl.bin build target. > >>> > >>Because u-boot-with-spl.bin does not wrap the spl image with a header > >>that the rom bootloader understands. > >What is the header we need? I assume it's not compatible with our > >previous headers. And if it's just a convenience for programming the > >flash, maybe we just stick with two files, to avoid further headaches > >upstream? It's a general rule that concatenating files would make > >programming easier, but it's a small savings on either end, yes? This > >would also make the packaging easier since it would just be > >SPL_IMAGE_FILE (or whatever) set to u-boot-spl.gph and so forth. Thanks! > > > I believe this is what the patch I submitted (to meta-arago) few > days ago do. > You need to define SPL_UART_BINARY in your recipe to enable the > extra do_install and do_deploy functionality.
Correct, but it doesn't support GPH yet, only SPL, AFAIK. Can you look into extending it in such a way it can be used for any/all of the use cases easily? -- Denys _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
