> Should the meta-ti layer be defining a prefered provider for the beagleboard kernel?
It's already defining a default provider: http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/tree/conf/machine/include/omap3.inc?h=daisy#n25 Denys Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Cliff Brake [[email protected]] Received: Friday, 11 Jul 2014, 9:19 To: [email protected] [[email protected]] Subject: [meta-ti] [diasy] omap2plus_defconfig does not include systemd support Hi, I'm trying to get a daisy build working on the beagleboard. Its currently building the linux-ti-staging-3.14 kernel for the bb. However, this kernel appears to use the omap2plus_defconfig from the http://git.ti.com/ti-linux-kernel repo. What is the best path to get omap2plus_defconfig modified to support systemd (its just a minor tweak for cgroups? Ideally, we'd get omap2plus_defconfig modified in the upstream kernel. Perhaps for now, we could have a config fragment in the recipe? NOTE: multiple providers are available for virtual/kernel (linux-ti-staging, linux-mainline, linux-dummy, linux) NOTE: consider defining a PREFERRED_PROVIDER entry to match virtual/kernel Should the meta-ti layer be defining a prefered provider for the beagleboard kernel? Thanks, Cliff -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
-- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
