On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:24:15PM -0400, Cliff Brake wrote: > > That is interesting indeed. If they felt the need to overwrite the entire > include file for the SOC, then they should care to keep it updated or set all > necessary defaults. Otherwise they should have used a more unique name, like > omap3-gumstix.inc and made necessary customizations in there, keeping the > original upstream omap3.inc intact and using or not using it from their > machine configs accordingly. For example, I've dealt with u-boot.inc in a > similar fashion in meta-ti: > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/meta-ti/tree/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot-ti.inc
Thanks for the ideas, I'll see if we can get meta-gumstix-community modified. Thanks, Clff -- _______________________________________________ meta-ti mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
