Jake, Denys - some questions for you.
>> +PV = "16.9.2"
> Would it be better to have this in the recipe filename? I'm not sure
if there is a preference.
Denys, what is the recommendation? I see both approaches, I can rework
and submit if the PV should be included in the filename.
>> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
> It appears that there is not support for the "target" class as the
installer is for the x86 architecture.
Just to be clear, would it be fine to just remove the nativesdk?
Regards
Karthik
On 21-Apr-17 8:02 PM, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
Karthik,
A couple concerns below.
Thanks,
Jake
On 4/21/2017 10:15 AM, Karthik Ramanan wrote:
Signed-off-by: Karthik Ramanan <[email protected]>
---
recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.bb | 8 ++++++++
recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.inc | 36
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.bb
create mode 100644 recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.inc
diff --git a/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.bb
b/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.bb
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..82c1903
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+include ti-cgt-arm.inc
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM =
"file://${PN}_${PV}.LTS/README.txt;md5=c32eadd03472353c042a8a7c4568438b"
+
+PV = "16.9.2"
Would it be better to have this in the recipe filename? I'm not sure
if there is a preference.
+
+BINFILE_MD5 = "7b73e51e9548a4a0bf3923a336b1a974"
+BINFILE_SHA256 =
"d1a5c255319088be7d75b3fce1b16a2e3d60c75023db7dad16cab6d4d3425d06"
diff --git a/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.inc
b/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.inc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3897b2e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-ti/devtools/ti-cgt-arm.inc
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+SUMMARY= "TI ARM Code Generation Tools"
+HOMEPAGE =
"https://www-a.ti.com/downloads/sds_support/TICodegenerationTools/download.htm";
+LICENSE = "(TI-TSPA & Thai-Open-Source-Software-Center) &
BSD-3-Clause & BSL-1.0 & Hewlett-Packard & AFL-3.0 & MIT &
BSD-2-Clause & PD & BSD-4-Clause"
+
+require recipes-ti/includes/ti-unpack.inc
+require recipes-ti/includes/ti-staging.inc
+require recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/ti-cgt-arm-${PV}"
+
+SRC_URI =
"http://software-dl.ti.com/codegen/esd/cgt_public_sw/TMS470/${PV}.LTS/${BINFILE};name=${BINFILE_NAME}";
+
+BINFILE = "ti_cgt_tms470_${PV}.LTS_linux_installer_x86.bin"
+TI_BIN_UNPK_ARGS = "--prefix ${S}"
+TI_BIN_UNPK_CMDS = ""
+
+do_install() {
+ install -d ${D}${M4_TOOLCHAIN_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}
+ cp -r ${S}/ti-cgt-arm*/. ${D}${M4_TOOLCHAIN_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}
+}
+
+SRC_URI[cgt_arm_installer.md5sum] = "${BINFILE_MD5}"
+SRC_URI[cgt_arm_installer.sha256sum] = "${BINFILE_SHA256}"
+
+BINFILE_NAME = "cgt_arm_installer"
+BINFILE = "ti_cgt_tms470_${PV}.LTS_linux_installer_x86.bin"
+
+FILES_${PN} += "${M4_TOOLCHAIN_INSTALL_DIR_RECIPE}"
+
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
It appears that there is not support for the "target" class as the
installer is for the x86 architecture.
+
+INHIBIT_PACKAGE_STRIP = "1"
+INHIBIT_SYSROOT_STRIP = "1"
+INHIBIT_PACKAGE_DEBUG_SPLIT = "1"
+
+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "arch staticdev"
--
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
