Denys,
I've taken care of your comments:
* renamed the recipe to include the version name.
* also made it native.
Posted v3.
Regards
Karthik
On 24-Apr-17 11:06 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:37:41PM +0530, Karthik Ramanan wrote:
Jake, Denys - some questions for you.
+PV = "16.9.2"
Would it be better to have this in the recipe filename? I'm not
sure if there is a preference.
Denys, what is the recommendation? I see both approaches, I can
rework and submit if the PV should be included in the filename.
Depends on how often you plan to update the recipe and whether you will have
between-releases snapshots. That's usually the case with git-based components.
In case of tarball or binary-installer components, the convention is to use
the version in the filename.
+BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
It appears that there is not support for the "target" class as the
installer is for the x86 architecture.
Just to be clear, would it be fine to just remove the nativesdk?
Are there plans to have ARM installer? If not, then "target" recipe with
BBCLASSEXTEND won't work - you just need to do a -native recipe directly.
--
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
