Thanks Bruce,

On Tue, 2023-11-07 at 08:23 -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> > > > Which is why if a kernel type that can merge fragments, but yet
> > > > is disabling the feature specification, the layer should emit a
> > > > warning. I'd then have another variable which inhibits the warning
> > > > message. Since that is something I can ask about in bug reports
> > > > and until the warning message is re-enabled, the reporter is on
> > > > their own.
> > > 
> > > My solution is now in master-next:
> > > 
> > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization/commit/?h=master-next&id=45c2297a916516e5fc7b82dab46c4719590813b7
> > 
> > I've tested your solution and it solves the issue on my side,
> > thank you for addressing it so quickly!
> > 
> > There is a problem in the warning code though, namely a typo here:
> > 
> > skip_kernel_include_enabled = d.getVar('SKIP_META_VIRT_KERNEL_INLUDE')
> > 
> > if it would be
> > 
> > skip_kernel_include_enabled = d.getVar('SKIP_META_VIRT_KERNEL_INCLUDE')
> > 
> > the warning would be emitted as expected. After the change both emitting
> > and silencing the warning works fine.
> 
> oops!
> 
> I just force pushed the fix to master-next.

Tested-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>

if it matters

-- 
Alexander Sverdlin
Siemens AG
www.siemens.com
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8442): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8442
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102416724/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to