On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:08 AM Michal Orzel <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
>
> On 27/11/2023 14:55, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 5:38 AM Michal Orzel <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Some follow-up patches after a recent Xen recipes update.
> >>
> >> Open question:
> >> Shouldn't we set 4.18 as a default version?
> >
> > Not yet (and definitely not for nanbield). Perhaps once it has been under
> > test for a few weeks. I did the updates to get them some extra soak time
> > and make them available in both the upcoming release (nanbield) and
> > master for those that want to use the latest, without making it a default
> > version jump so late in the cycle.
> Ok.
>

Thanks, Bruce.


>
> >
> > As for the changes in master, the 4.18 version on the _git recipes is
> > intentional, as there's been no 4.19 tag that I can find and I don't bump
> > versions until I see that in the repo .. so for now, it is just the +git
> > and +stable that is the difference between the 4.18 and _git versions.
> You won't see any 4.19 tag until the next release. The version is
> advertised in
> the main Makefile [1] and this is what user can see in the system
> (e.g. in the boot log, xl info, xen_version hypercall).
> Bumping the XEN_REL of master recipes


I think it could be helpful for the context of this thread to describe them
as the "git recipes" rather than using the term "master recipe", because
the latter unfortunately seems to convey that they are somehow superior to
the other, versioned, Xen recipes, when in practice they are not -- they
are deliberately not the default version of Xen that is built since, as you
note, they are defined:


> to reflect the current development version
>

of Xen. ie. The git recipes are present alongside the other recipes that
provide the stable release version(s) of Xen.

As Michal has noted above, putting 4.19 for XEN_REL into the git recipe
does look right from a Xen source tree perspective for that SRCREV, even
though there is not a 4.19 Xen release, but the proposed commit message
should be updated to avoid the term "master recipe".

Thanks Michal for the update to bring the tools recipe up to the same
revision as the hypervisor.

Christopher



> is what I've been doing for the last 2 cycles [2], [3]:
>
> [1] https://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=blob;f=xen/Makefile#l8
> [2]
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization/commit/?id=3581dd56aa97ae17b480692aeb733ca0d1fa0eec
> [3]
> https://git.yoctoproject.org/meta-virtualization/commit/?id=265518e6899726a47bb150f248a18d56dfbbffdf
> >
> > I've grabbed the 4.17 version bump from the series.
> + master tools recipe SHA update
>
> ~Michal
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8474): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8474
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102826507/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to