Hello,

On 28/11/2023 04:11, Christopher Clark wrote:
>       
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 6:08 AM Michal Orzel <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi Bruce,
> 
>     On 27/11/2023 14:55, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 5:38 AM Michal Orzel <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >> Some follow-up patches after a recent Xen recipes update.
>     >>
>     >> Open question:
>     >> Shouldn't we set 4.18 as a default version?
>     >
>     > Not yet (and definitely not for nanbield). Perhaps once it has been 
> under
>     > test for a few weeks. I did the updates to get them some extra soak time
>     > and make them available in both the upcoming release (nanbield) and
>     > master for those that want to use the latest, without making it a 
> default
>     > version jump so late in the cycle.
>     Ok.
> 
> 
> Thanks, Bruce.
>  
> 
> 
>     >
>     > As for the changes in master, the 4.18 version on the _git recipes is
>     > intentional, as there's been no 4.19 tag that I can find and I don't 
> bump
>     > versions until I see that in the repo .. so for now, it is just the +git
>     > and +stable that is the difference between the 4.18 and _git versions.
>     You won't see any 4.19 tag until the next release. The version is 
> advertised in
>     the main Makefile [1] and this is what user can see in the system
>     (e.g. in the boot log, xl info, xen_version hypercall).
>     Bumping the XEN_REL of master recipes 
> 
> 
> I think it could be helpful for the context of this thread to describe them 
> as the "git recipes" rather than using the term "master recipe", because the 
> latter unfortunately seems to convey that they are somehow superior to the 
> other, versioned, Xen recipes, when in practice they are not -- they are 
> deliberately not the default version of Xen that is built since, as you note, 
> they are defined:
>  
> 
>     to reflect the current development version
> 
> 
> of Xen. ie. The git recipes are present alongside the other recipes that 
> provide the stable release version(s) of Xen.
> 
> As Michal has noted above, putting 4.19 for XEN_REL into the git recipe does 
> look right from a Xen source tree perspective for that SRCREV, even though 
> there is not a 4.19 Xen release, but the proposed commit message should be 
> updated to avoid the term "master recipe".
Sounds good to me.

@Bruce, may I please ask you to take my patch modifying XEN_REL and do 
s/master/git in title on commit?
If not, I will push a v2 of this patch.

~Michal
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8476): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8476
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/102826507/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to