On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 12:16 PM Fathi Boudra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 at 18:10, Bruce Ashfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, no. I've already rejected similar patches in the past.
> >
> > The specific versioning is intentional and is going to stay. It tracks
> > what is supported and tested in a given branch.
> >
> > If someone needs to deviate from what I'm marking as tested, they can
> > carry a file in their layers.
>
> That's unfortunate. Let's all carry a workaround for this one-liner
> that hasn't changed in 4 years.
>

I'm not sure what you are implying, but I am constantly changing the
versioned linux-yocto .inc file to match the upstream file.

Which is exactly the point of that file, not the contents within the
file.

Bruce

> -  <project path="meta-virtualization" name="meta-virtualization"/>
> +  <project path="meta-virtualization" name="meta-virtualization" >
> +     <copyfile
> src="recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_6.6_virtualization.inc"
> dest="meta-virtualization/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_%_virtualization.inc"
> />
> +  </project>



-- 
- Thou shalt not follow the NULL pointer, for chaos and madness await
thee at its end
- "Use the force Harry" - Gandalf, Star Trek II
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#8577): 
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/message/8577
Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/104511325/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/meta-virtualization/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to