On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Mike Looijmans <mike.looijm...@topic.nl> wrote: > On 03-08-16 18:52, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote: >> >> Hi Mike/Nathan >> >> On 08/01/2016 10:47 PM, Mike Looijmans wrote: >>> >>> On 01-08-16 20:54, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Nathan, >>>> >>>> On 07/31/2016 06:15 AM, Nathan Rossi wrote: >> >> <...>> >>> >>> The PROVIDES was required, because the 'kernel-module-mali' name isn't >>> known at parse time yet, only when do_install has run. So anything that >>> (R)DEPENDS on kernel-module-mali would wrongly assume that the kernel >>> will provide it, and the module would still not be built. It would only >>> be available if you manually add a DEPENDS on the recipe name. >>> >>> The simplest and most straightforward solution is to name the recipe >>> such that it matches the package being built. Then all this trickery >>> isn't needed at all. >>> >> Should we just rename it then? > > > Yes, that was my intention, but I now see that patch never made it to my > outbox. I'll send a patch tomorrow. >
I've applied that patch, as well as this patch. It exposed the fact that ep108-zynqmp which defaults to linux-yocto doesn't provide support for the mali module. So I added an additional patch to have this recommends only when using virtual/kernel == linux-xlnx. Thanks, Nathan -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
