Hi Mike,
On 11/28/2017 01:09 AM, Mike Looijmans wrote:
The "open source" way is to avoid the FSBL (and in fact, all of
meta-xilinx-tools) and use u-boot SPL instead. All functionality
provided by the fsbl/bootgen flow is provided by u-boot SPL already.
"All functionality" would be a blanket statement, there are many driver
support that is officially tested by Xilinx in fsbl/bootgen flow,
including safety and security support
Thanks,
Manju
On 20-11-17 22:08, Peter Smith wrote:
Hi, I’m aware of the meta-xilinx-tools layer, but this needs you to
have the Xilinx SDK installed (unless I’m mistaken), I was wondering
ion there were any plans to create support in meta-xilinx for building
the FSBL without the need for the SDK dependency. Peter
On 20 Nov 2017, at 21:05, Giordon Stark <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi (resending from right address),
You can indeed build the FSBL + boot.bin using the meta-xilinx-tools
layer: https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx-tools
Giordon
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:03 PM Peter Smith <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
A question, I was wondering why there is no support for building
FSBL in
a similar way to that provided by meta-xilinx for the PMU
firmware, is
there a technical reason or is it just one of those things that
has not
yet been got around to? Thanks in advance Peter.
--
Kind regards,
Mike Looijmans
System Expert
TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: [email protected]
Website: www.topicproducts.com
Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
--
_______________________________________________
meta-xilinx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
