Hi Nathan, > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:meta-xilinx- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Nathan Rossi > Sent: Sunday, March 18, 2018 6:33 AM > To: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH] binutils: Rebase microblaze patches for > binutils > v2.30 > > On 8 March 2018 at 11:15, Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego > <[email protected]> wrote: > > oe-core has upgraded binutils to v2.30, which caused some of our > > patches to fail, rebase these along with other minimal changes to > > avoid these errors and provide compatibility with latest oe-core. > > Unfortunately your mail client or something has mangled your email by > trashing the > whitespacing. Because the binutils patches have mixed indentation its quite > hard to > demangle them. > > error: patch failed: > meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils%.bbappend:1 > error: meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils%.bbappend: > patch does not apply > error: patch failed: > meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils-2.29/0004-Fix-relaxation-of- > assembler-resolved-references.patch:28 > error: meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils-2.29/0004-Fix- > relaxation-of-assembler-resolved-references.patch: > patch does not apply > error: patch failed: > meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils-2.29/0005-Fixup-MicroBlaze- > debug_loc-sections-after-linker-rel.patch:25 > error: meta-xilinx-bsp/recipes-microblaze/binutils/binutils-2.29/0005-Fixup- > MicroBlaze-debug_loc-sections-after-linker-rel.patch: > patch does not apply > > > However I went ahead and rebased the binutils git trees these patches are > formatted from. > > https://github.com/nathanrossi/binutils-gdb/tree/microblaze/2.30/rebased > > I also took into account the oe binutils patches, which should avoid any > issues with > fuzzing (since warnings are now generated on fuzz, > http://git.openembedded.org/openembedded- > core/commit/?id=5133fd46bccf14e21680f8d94e952914edccb113). > > However I have only been able to test the update properly on MicroBlaze > machines > (where there are no regressions) and was unable to get zcu102 to boot with its > PMU firmware (issues with qemu-xilinx and glibc 2.27? and or newer qemu-xilinx > versions not booting). > > I pushed a unfinished work in progress commit which contains the patches > exported > from the above binutils ref, https://github.com/nathanrossi/meta- > xilinx/commit/d0e57b48add1f26a0b7931e41e340666586d409e > > Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to sort out the zcu102 regression or > test on > a build machine which does not have issues building the current version of > qemu- > xilinx in meta-xilinx. >
We will start looking on master in upcoming weeks and check what is breaking, will keep you posted on mailing list Thanks, Manju -- _______________________________________________ meta-xilinx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
