Gaetan Trudel wrote:
> >I have subscribed to the list one week before I got MetaCard and I'm
> >disappointed in that area of printing because I see myself probably
> >spending more time scripting printing routines than developping the
> >stacks them selves.
> >
> >If MetaCard Corp. wants to make their software more attractive to
> >HyperCard users, make it at least a little better than HyperCard at
> >printing. If they want to make MetaCard a more attractive AND complete
> >software, add strong and intuitive report features to it.
> >
Andu answered:
>
> So you think that would do it? Considering all advantages MC offers
> including almost 100% cross platform compatibility, fast engine, etc.,etc.
> and mainly a "normal" language by comparison to most other script languages
> around, I doubt someone who needs such an environment would find it not
> attractive because it doesn't do good printing. Also consider that if
> there really is a problem with MC chances are it will be fixed sooner
> rather then later which was never an option with HyperCard.
I didn't say *that would do it*.
I said *more* attractive, I also said *complete*.
I already bought a license for a home stack because I agree with the
rest of what you said.
You know, I'm in the printing business, so printing *is* important to us.
Printing in MC 2.3...? hope to be there soon.
Regards,
Gaetan
--
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Gaetan Trudel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Conseiller technique, pr�-presse �lectronique/
* Technical Adviser, Electronic Pre-Press
* Litho Acme Inc., 85 de Castelnau W., Montr�al, Qc, Canada H2R 2W3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
