On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Andu wrote: > > Also if Mac's won't run .mt > >scripts the same way as Unix, and following on from Scott's comments on > >Windows NT servers, wouldn't it be good to implement CGI's in a platform > >independent way? > > Who stops you? You just have to build the server to do scripts instead of > executing a file. That means the client has to send to the server the name > of a handler instead of of a file in which case you have(in a generic way): > > get itemOffset(handlerName,listOfAvailableHandlers) > if it is not 0 then > handlerName > write the_result_from_handler to socket X > > and it's probably faster too. *Much* faster. And much easier to debug too. Scott > Regards, Andu > > ******************************************************** Scott Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.metacard.com MetaCard: You know, there's an easier way to do that...
- Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Nelson Zink
- Re: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Scott Raney
- Apache no more: Metacard server and and Metacard ... David Bovill
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard server and and Me... andu
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard server and an... David Bovill
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard server a... Andu
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard serv... Pierre Sahores
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard serv... David Bovill
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard ... Andu
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard ... Scott Raney
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard serv... David Bovill
- Re: Apache no more: Metacard ... Scott Raney
- RE: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Marni Centor
- RE: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Scott Raney
- Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Nelson Zink
- Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Nelson Zink
- Re: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's David Bovill
- Re: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's andu
- Re: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's Scott Raney
- Re: Apache Server and Metacard CGI's David Bovill
