Scott Raney wrote:
../...
> Running a MetaCard CGI should be no problem, performance-wise.
> Loading a 4MB file would be though. We don't have any plans to
> support FastCGI (or NSAPI or ISAPI or any of the other architectures
> for doing this). You could build in support for it with Embedded
> MetaCard, but if *I* were doing it, I'd use mchttpd and just direct
> the CGI calls to a different port number on the server that goes
> directly to the engine. This is going to be even faster than any of
> these other alternatives and would be immensely easier to debug.
Ok and thank's a lot, Scott. I will try - and report the result to the
list - your "mchttpd/second port" suggestion, which seems to be exactly
what i need.
> I think your English wasn't the problem, it was leaving out the small
> detail that you were loading 4MB of data in your CGI ;-)
> Regards,
> Scott
>
>
> ********************************************************
> Scott Raney [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.metacard.com
> MetaCard: You know, there's an easier way to do that...
--
Pierre Sahores
This is the MetaCard mailing list.
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/metacard%40lists.best.com/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
