> >I have a question for everyone - how many people are still using a 56K modem?
I will be stuck at low baud rates into the future, it seems. DSL will
never be an option for me -- our house is too far from the CO, I've
tried to get it twice. Cable access is not offered in our neighborhood
and won't be for a very long time -- the only cable company here is
starting their installations in the suburbs and won't be providing
access to the inner city for a long time. I have an ISDN connection that
only runs on one channel (64K) -- which isn't much better than 56K. I am
considering downgrading my phone line to a plain residential line and
getting a 56K modem, since it will save me a lot of money and the
difference in connection speed is negligible.
Don't assume even all the techies have broadband. ;)
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | 612-724-1596
Custom hypermedia solutions | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
