Title: RE: Making the case for non-browser "Web apps"
Ok.  We all know that there are currently 3 methods of embedding data into our stacks.

We can:

1- Choose to import our elements
2- Use the full path to the element (begins from the HD name right to the element)
3- Start from the stack's position and point to the image directory (whatever you may call it)

The new "set directory to URL" is a feature that I (and likely others) have asked Scott to implement.  Basically you would build your stack and point to all the elements locally on your disk.  When your stack is ready, you can publish it to the web using a "set directory to URL" and then the stack can be used by anyone on the net while the resources you used to build it are being called from a directory at a specified URL.  The first implementation may require that you call the images directly from the server while building it, but I'm hoping that provisions will be made so we can build locally then using some type of "preference setting" toggle the set directory to point to either a local folder or to a desired URL.

So, instead of all your images or movies having the following as a filename "data/images/bony.gif" they would actually look like this "http://www.your-url-here.com/projectskull/images/bony.gif".  This way you can send out a runtime stack that loads the resources from your server as the viewer runs through the stack.

Like me, you could build a MetaCard browser, this stack serves as the MC engine and is actually devoid of any information.  When the stack is run it looks at your server and checks to see if there are a list of other stacks, if so then it lists them.  The user clicks on a stack (typically 16k) and it instantly opens on their desktop in runtime mode (due to the MC browser).  When that stack opens it calls all the resources from the server.  You are actually deploying stacks over the web in realtime!

For CBT developers this would be great as it allows for total control over the text and other elements in a stack (just like a browser there is only 1 repository).  If you shipped a CD ROM and decided to change a graphic then you'd be toasted.  If you change an element on the server then all stacks running around the globe get the update the moment the stack calls it.

I'm telling you, MetaCard will really make it easy for us to deploy anywhere and still control our content. You can do this now but you really need to build a finely tuned script to keep track of all the resources being copied to the disk (you may want the user to cache or actually store a copy as they run through your stack - depends on the content, such as large movies (why download more than once in a session)).

Clear as mud?

Simon,
Could you elucidate what this new "set directory" command is all about and how it will work?
rgds,
Blair
-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Lord [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Making the case for non-browser "Web apps"

 All we are waiting for now is for Scott and his crew
to implement a new *set directory* command which would allow all MC
users to point to "http://www/amigo-3.com/discreet/images/" rather
than to "data/images/story.gif" (the URL actually being the one you
want, not mine:^).

--


Cheers,
Simon

All your .com .net and .org domains for only $14.50 each.
Get them while they last... http://www.amigo-3.com/hosting/

--------------------------------------------------
"The great discoveries in science are not punctuated by 'Eureka! I've found it!' but rather "Hmmm,that's funny...." Isaac Asimov

Reply via email to