I guess much of this is already possible with the use of andu's ftp stack
(perhaps running invisibly) and the load command to achieve what you are
doing (with some scripting of course!). after all, writing to a remote
server would need a protocol and since andu's ftp work is already there, one
can build on it.

a card script can start loading all the files of the card you visit. and as
individual loads complete, they get placed in the image. 

there is one thing i noticed about load. you cannot "put" the partially
loaded file (say a gif file) into an image (until it is fully loaded in
cache). but using sockets, one can get a progressive (line by line, like a
browser) display in an image of the data as it comes in (only for gifs, i
think. i havent been able to get a similar display on jpegs. they seem to
only display when the data is complete).

regards

vikram

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001 19:24:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>  Ok.  We all know that there are currently 3 methods of embedding data 
>  into our stacks.
>  
>  We can:
>  
>  1- Choose to import our elements
>  2- Use the full path to the element (begins from the HD name right to 
>  the element)
>  3- Start from the stack's position and point to the image directory 
>  (whatever you may call it)
>  
>  The new "set directory to URL" is a feature that I (and likely 
>  others) have asked Scott to implement.  Basically you would build 
>  your stack and point to all the elements locally on your disk.  When 
>  your stack is ready, you can publish it to the web using a "set 
>  directory to URL" and then the stack can be used by anyone on the net 
>  while the resources you used to build it are being called from a 
>  directory at a specified URL.  The first implementation may require 
>  that you call the images directly from the server while building it, 
>  but I'm hoping that provisions will be made so we can build locally 
>  then using some type of "preference setting" toggle the set directory 
>  to point to either a local folder or to a desired URL.
>  
>  So, instead of all your images or movies having the following as a 
>  filename "data/images/bony.gif" they would actually look like this 
>  "http://www.your-url-here.com/projectskull/images/bony.gif".  This 
>  way you can send out a runtime stack that loads the resources from 
>  your server as the viewer runs through the stack.
>  
>  Like me, you could build a MetaCard browser, this stack serves as the 
>  MC engine and is actually devoid of any information.  When the stack 
>  is run it looks at your server and checks to see if there are a list 
>  of other stacks, if so then it lists them.  The user clicks on a 
>  stack (typically 16k) and it instantly opens on their desktop in 
>  runtime mode (due to the MC browser).  When that stack opens it calls 
>  all the resources from the server.  You are actually deploying stacks 
>  over the web in realtime!
>  
>  For CBT developers this would be great as it allows for total control 
>  over the text and other elements in a stack (just like a browser 
>  there is only 1 repository).  If you shipped a CD ROM and decided to 
>  change a graphic then you'd be toasted.  If you change an element on 
>  the server then all stacks running around the globe get the update 
>  the moment the stack calls it.
>  
>  I'm telling you, MetaCard will really make it easy for us to deploy 
>  anywhere and still control our content. You can do this now but you 
>  really need to build a finely tuned script to keep track of all the 
>  resources being copied to the disk (you may want the user to cache or 
>  actually store a copy as they run through your stack - depends on the 
>  content, such as large movies (why download more than once in a 
>  session)).
>  
>  Clear as mud?
>  
>  >Simon,
>  >
>  >Could you elucidate what this new "set directory" command is all 
>  >about and how it will work?
>  >rgds,
>  >Blair
>  >
>  >-----Original Message-----
>  >From: Simon Lord [<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>  >Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 12:02 PM
>  >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >Subject: RE: Making the case for non-browser "Web apps"
>  >
>  >
>  >  All we are waiting for now is for Scott and his crew
>  >to implement a new *set directory* command which would allow all MC
>  >users to point to 
> 
>"<http://www/amigo-3.com/discreet/images/>http://www/amigo-3.com/discreet/images/"
>  >rather
>  >than to "data/images/story.gif" (the URL actually being the one you
>  >want, not mine:^).
>  
>  -- 
>  
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Simon
>  
>  All your .com .net and .org domains for only $14.50 each.
>  Get them while they last... http://www.amigo-3.com/hosting/
>  
>  --------------------------------------------------
>  "The great discoveries in science are not punctuated by 'Eureka! I've 
>  found it!' but rather "Hmmm,that's funny...." Isaac Asimov





_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/



Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.

Reply via email to