On 31/03/01 9:58, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So let's all lay off the HyperCard folks. Many of us here may look down on
> HyperCard, but somewhere there may be a person who graduated from MetaCard
> to C++ who is laughing at us. And that's not right either.
And yes, it is to no use to "make fun" of the Hypercard people. But you
should warn people and help them to move on to other tools - probably
MetaCard.
And at the same time it is important to evaluate the stability of the
platforms we are choosing. We went from HyperTalk to MetaTalk, and are
extreemely satisfied!
The support from Scott Raney is splendid and the tools is much better than
HyperCards.
But we forgot to ask about one important issue: How strong are the MetaCard
organisation, how is the financial backing and are there a good and solid
group of people behind the development - or is it a pure one man/woman
product?
Best regards
Carsten Levin
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Info: http://www.xworlds.com/metacard/mailinglist.htm
Please send bug reports to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, not this list.
