On 7/30/03 1:11 AM, "Gregory Lypny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wanna give me a hint as to which of the dozens of properties I should > be looking at? No information on array, but it should be at least comparable to custom property. So that gives 4 GB limit on what you can store in array, and nothing else is using the same RAM, including other variables and apps. Sorry, still no answer to your question. I assume 4 GB limit on the array storage includes the overhead of array index (or a separated RAM space, still limit by 4 GB). Given all the limits MetaCard imposed on other objects, it is safe to assume that the number of element (index) of an array is limited by the machine memory, or up to 4 GB, if you have stored nothing in the array. Don't take my words for it though. I'll be happy if someone else can prove me wrong. -- > Gregory Lypny > Associate professor > Concordia University > ___________________ > "Better for us if you don't understand." > The Tragically Hip > > http://pareto.concordia.ca > > > > > On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 12:02 PM, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Message: 6 >> Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 22:40:39 +0800 >> Subject: Re: Limits on array dimensions >> From: LiangTyan Fui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> On 7/29/03 9:07 PM, "Gregory Lypny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Hello everyone, >>> >>> Is there a limit on the number of elements that an indexed array can >>> hold? >> >> go card 900 of stack "MetaTalk Reference" >> >> -- >> >>> Greg >>> >>> > G > _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
