Greg
Gregory Lypny
Associate Professor
Concordia University
___________________
"Out of the blue,
and into the black.
You paid for this,
but they gave you that."Neil Young
http://pareto.concordia.ca
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:22:36 +0800 Subject: Re: Limits on array dimensions From: LiangTyan Fui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/30/03 1:11 AM, "Gregory Lypny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Wanna give me a hint as to which of the dozens of properties I should be looking at?
No information on array, but it should be at least comparable to custom
property. So that gives 4 GB limit on what you can store in array, and
nothing else is using the same RAM, including other variables and apps.
Sorry, still no answer to your question. I assume 4 GB limit on the array
storage includes the overhead of array index (or a separated RAM space,
still limit by 4 GB).
Given all the limits MetaCard imposed on other objects, it is safe to assume
that the number of element (index) of an array is limited by the machine
memory, or up to 4 GB, if you have stored nothing in the array.
Don't take my words for it though. I'll be happy if someone else can prove
me wrong.
_______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
