on 22/8/03 8:27 pm, Richard Gaskin wrote >> As the products converge, it would seem useful if the first two items >> weren't split across different lists, and indeed we already see a certain >> amount of cross-posting. The metacard list might be best kept for the last, >> or at least the last two, of these categories. > > Agreed. There seems to be a natural migration of general language questions > to the use-rev list anyway, [...snip...] > For those of you who haven't signed on to the use-rev list I can honest;y > say you're missing some great discussion. A good many very smart folks with > extensive experience across each of the supported platforms hang out there.
And on the improve-rev list, for example, there is currently a discussion about namespaces which would certainly benefit from the experience of the developers on this list; while the recent discussion of the 'do' etc script limits was split across both lists - I'm sure it would have been more helpful to have the discussion unified in one place. Heather - can you confirm what the policy on access to the improve-rev list will be, going forward? Thanks, Ben Rubinstein | Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cognitive Applications Ltd | Phone: +44 (0)1273-821600 http://www.cogapp.com | Fax : +44 (0)1273-728866 _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
