> > I still haven't thought of a reason to maintain the MetaCard > IDE let alone > > the documentation. > > What in FreeGUI has earned your recommendation to devote time to > working on > it? I haven't played with it much since last year, so I may well > be missing > something.
Nothing, I didn't recommend FreeGUI. That's the worst bit of the FreeCard project (sorry Alain). I recommended FreeCard which is the engine they are developing. I can see the technologies they are using to develop it and for anyone with Java and xCard skills it will offer a very extensible development platform. My only concern is that pure Java GUIs are usually very slow so a Java GUI with xTalk over the top is likely to be a slug. And let's all hope they don't use swing because it looks like crap. > > > Don't get me wrong. Rev is not the be all and end all. But MetaCard's > > time is over. It's time to move on whether you realise it now or in > > 10 years time. > > MetaCard is alive and well, serving as the foundation for RunRev. As > arguably the most flexible xTalk ever, it can support an unlimited variety > of IDEs to accomodate any preference. Maybe you missed something but MetaCard is now only an IDE that can be used with the Revolution engine ;-) Sorry but our world has changed no matter how much you try and keep it the same. Regards Monte _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
