> We might want to give some thought to image IDs, for Rev compatibilitywhere practical and to avoid conflicts with current images IDs. Suggestions?
Well, I'm fine with changing the IDs of the current images in MC, but keep in mind that this may conflict with other people's icons (i.e. they may have provided their own replacements and now they won't work). I honestly don't think that anyone created images in that ID range for other purposes (because they shouldn't have according to the MC docs), but I can see accidentally kaboshing people's answer/ask dialog replacement icons.
Does anyone have any objection to me changing the IDs of the icons in the MetaCard IDE to use the same ID numbers as Rev uses for their icons of the same type/name?
Or is there a better suggestion/approach?
Ken Ray
While at it, you might want to fix the little issue of icons staying put in the top location instead of sliding down if the dialog content is long.
Using icon ids from Rev might be a good idea if it works as it would ensure full compatibility between environments. People who happen to used those ids will have to change their code when switching to this version of IDE. I don't think it is too much to ask.
Robert Brenstein
I mean that the icons now slide down whereas I'd want them to stay put. Am I the only one noticing this?
Robert Brenstein
PS the new icons are really great. _______________________________________________ metacard mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard
