Hi Richard,

There's an outstanding request to fix an issue in the engine with regard to pasting images:

   Currently, pasting an image from the Clipboard causes one
   of two things to happen:  either the image is pasted into
   the bottom-most image object, or if there are no image
   objects it creates a new image sized to match the entire
   card.  It's rarely the case in my own work that either is
   what I want. :)
<http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/show_bug.cgi?id=2473>

While RunRev hasn't taken the time to address this in the engine, they did take the time to implement a workaround in their IDE's Edit menu:

    if the clipBoard is "image" and the selectedImage is empty then
      lock messages
      lock screen
      create image
      put the clipBoardData["image"] into last image
      unlock messages
      unlock screen
      put true into tObjects
      choose pointer tool
      select last image

So at least their IDE works, even if users will be confused when their standalone behaves differently.

The question for us is whether we should maintain the purity of the MC IDE by using the engine's Paste command as it does now, or favor usability by implementing the workaround script from RR.

I'd like to say be able to report that we can expect a fix on this soon, but it's been outstanding for half a year so I think if we want this it it may not be productive to wait for the engine to catch up with us.

OK, this is now (obvious) engine bug nr. 2 (besides "set cursor to hand", and maybe more...)
I don't think that we should workaround this in our beloved lean IDE...


We CAN of course, if necessary. ;-)

Mr. Miller once promised (yes, he did!) to NOT touch anything in the engine, so we
"friends of Carlotta er Metacard" will not experience any incoveniences...


But it looks like that his memory i fading... :-/

Yes, they lack resources (actullay i heard this one much too often and cannot stand
this argument any longer!!!) but WE cannot tell this to our customers, i think...


So the question is will Rev support the engine fully or not resp. "tweak" its IDE to
"balance out" some engine inconsistencies?


Yes, i AM a bit upset :-)

Especially if there are so many serious(!) and pending bugs and we have to hear
something like "...upcoming features/news that will change the way of using Rev completely",
as Mr. Miller stated in the chat last week, then i DO feel a bit pissed... :-)


 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World Media Corporation
 ___________________________________________________________
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]       http://www.FourthWorld.com

Regards

Klaus Major
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.major-k.de

_______________________________________________
metacard mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard

Reply via email to