On Jul 6, 1:42 am, Anthony Bryan <[email protected]> wrote:
> the SFC is an umbrella non-profit org, & Metalink joining would give
> us the benefits of being a non-profit w/o most of the administrative
> hassles.
>
> about 20 other projects like Boost, Inkscape, jQuery, Mercurial,
> Samba, Sugar Labs, & Wine are members.
>
> http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/overview/

it looks like the next step is to codify our decision making style.

there are a number of choices, but I think one of these 3 fits how
we've been operating or might wish to operate in the future

leader
leader and committee with veto power
committee

the last 2 are probably the best fit, but I wanted to see what other
people think. it sounds like there would be few decisions to make a
year, so it's not too much work that's required of the committee.

--
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metalink Discussion" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to