leader + committee + veto sounds good to me as well. Neil
Anthony Bryan wrote: > thanks for the input! that may be the way to go. I would still like to > hear as many other people's opinions as possible. > > SFC said example decisions would be how to disburse money, such as > paying for someone to attend a conference. I think we would've only > had to make a couple decisions like this in the history of our > project, so it's not like we'd be bogged down in committees :) > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 9:03 AM, bmm<[email protected]> wrote: >> I think a the second is probably best: leader and committee with veto >> power. >> >> It think the community is so small that it's not really necessary do >> everything through a committee. I personally don't think that I'm much >> of a decision maker when it comes to metalinks, I enjoy development to >> much. I think having a leader at this point would make the decisions >> more focussed and it should send a clearer picture to the outside >> world. >> >> So, my vote is for the second. (We are doing this in committee style >> now, right? ;) ) >> >> Bram >> >> On Aug 13, 7:04 pm, Ant Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Jul 6, 1:42 am, Anthony Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> the SFC is an umbrella non-profit org, & Metalink joining would give >>>> us the benefits of being a non-profit w/o most of the administrative >>>> hassles. >>>> about 20 other projects like Boost, Inkscape, jQuery, Mercurial, >>>> Samba, Sugar Labs, & Wine are members. >>>> http://conservancy.softwarefreedom.org/overview/ >>> it looks like the next step is to codify our decision making style. >>> >>> there are a number of choices, but I think one of these 3 fits how >>> we've been operating or might wish to operate in the future >>> >>> leader >>> leader and committee with veto power >>> committee >>> >>> the last 2 are probably the best fit, but I wanted to see what other >>> people think. it sounds like there would be few decisions to make a >>> year, so it's not too much work that's required of the committee. >>> >>> -- >>> (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [http://www.metalinker.org] >>> )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads >>> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
