On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:19 PM, Nils <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 Mrz., 08:39, Anthony Bryan <[email protected]> wrote: >> by 'last hash' do you mean the strongest one? or the last one listed? > > I changed the code already to use the q-values dTa defines.
ahh... >> I had meant to post about the higher q value in the transition thread >> / can't remember if Peter mentioned that MirrorBrain used that. > > mirrorbrain.org serves dTa a meta4 with this q-value configuration. > dTa 1.1.x is still served metalink3 accordingly. So mirrorbrain.org > seems to perfectly support TCN. wonderful! >> looking forward to partial hashes. that will be so nice for big files. > > I spent most of the day rewriting the verification code to use > threads, and implemented partial hashes in the progress. > However only the meta4 parser currently recognizes <ml4:pieces>. > <ml3:pieces> parsing is still missing. WOW, AWESOME!!! I've been hoping for that for a while, I've always thought it was important for a seamless metalink download experience for people. will it be possible to do <ml3:pieces> and backport this to 1.1.x? I don't want to get too greedy :), but a long time between major versions would mean a long time before people get to use this. -- (( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ] )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metalink Discussion" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/metalink-discussion?hl=en.
