> > >> A clever mix of the two perhaps ? >> > > But is that possible? He was concerned about limited feedback and > ambiguous language. But at the time there was no effective computer > assisted education. Though, I'm not so sure that now it's that different > reading even this same thread. >
I was talking about George Hotz. I haven't had time to read Thurston's paper yet. Formalize a proof with metamath is certainly a very good way to understand an unformal proof. I don't know if you have alreay tried it. -- FL -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Metamath" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/01678304-2503-4c80-aad2-c03893a7b68f%40googlegroups.com.
