I would like that somebody could point out the failure of the following 
argument:

- The law of excluded middle is a theorem in Metamath: 
https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/exmid.html

- However, the Continuum Hypothesis is a counterexample of the law of 
excluded middle in ZFC, since it is neither true nor wrong.

How to avoid this conflict?

Thanks!

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Metamath" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/metamath/f3de6454-93b6-4ae1-856a-ceb4bb88c0abn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to