Bernd and List, I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception Junction is unique."
Best, Michael in so. Cal. On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Bernd V. Pauli <bernd.pa...@paulinet.de> wrote: > MichaelG. wrote: > > "In all seriousness, it is an attractive pallasite. > At first glance, it has a passing resemblance > to Brenham." > > In all seriousness: not only at first glance does it look > like Brenham. It does look suspiciously like Brenham. > > Maybe it is a transported Brenham mass! > > Cheers, > > Bernd > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
