Seems to me Intercourse Pennsylvania might be at least remotely related? Haha
---- Michael Mulgrew <[email protected]> wrote: > Bernd and List, > > I was thinking much the same thing, except for the statement by UCLA's > Dr. John Wasson given in the write-up: "…there is no main-group > pallasite that is closely related to Conception Junction. Conception > Junction is unique." > > Best, > Michael in so. Cal. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Bernd V. Pauli > <[email protected]> wrote: > > MichaelG. wrote: > > > > "In all seriousness, it is an attractive pallasite. > > At first glance, it has a passing resemblance > > to Brenham." > > > > In all seriousness: not only at first glance does it look > > like Brenham. It does look suspiciously like Brenham. > > > > Maybe it is a transported Brenham mass! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bernd > > > > > > ______________________________________________ > > Visit the Archives at > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list > > > ______________________________________________ > Visit the Archives at > http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html > Meteorite-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
