I disagree Norm,
 
I'm not a commercial hunter.  All the meteorites I find, I keep.  But If I sell 
someday sell one stone (0.05% of the total I find), I'm considered a commercial 
hunter. If I trade one stone in a thousand, I'm considered a commercial hunter 
and I have to spend 5, 10 or 15 hundred dollars for the privilege to selling or 
trade a common $50 meteorite.  If I get sick and have to sell my collection to 
pay medical bills or save my house, I'm breaking the law.  Sure it's not likely 
they will not come get me, but I am on the slippery path of skirting the rule 
of law.  At least before there wasn't an explicit rule against selling 
something now and then.
 
I've never needed a permit to collect one decorative boulder on BLM land (maybe 
I've been breaking the law??).  Still I think that me collecting one 
landscaping boulder every few years is quite different from someone selling 
hundreds of them to supplement their income.  That definitely requires a permit 
because it's blatant commercial use.
 
They say "casually collecting" meteorites is allowed free, without a permit.  
But a casual hobby hunter, who may someday TRADE a meteorite (even with a 
scientific institution), is required to wait an unspecified number of days 
(almost 200 days according to what Jim has learned) to purchase a 
commercial permit.  The BLM states that an environmental survey will be 
required before a permit will be granted, and we don't know yet if they will 
require a new survey when you apply for a renewal (for the same couple days 
spent walking over the same land).
 
I hunt maybe 10 days a year, and now I will have to pay several hundred dollars 
to be legal (maybe thousand because they charge you for the hours spent 
processing the paperwork, plus the time spent for the survey, plus time for 
enforcement and auditing my activities).
 
And if they want to audit me, does that mean I have to schedule my hunts ahead 
of time.  Is my permit only good for a fixed time period?   They don't explain 
how long the permits are good for or if they are for a calendar year.  It makes 
it very difficult to plan a hobby hunt.  Most of my hunts are short notice.  
It's very difficult to plan 180 + days ahead of time.  10 days a year seems 
very casually collected to me, certainly not commercial collection.
 
Say I apply for a hunt the summer of 2013, and they finally approve my permit 
months later - that leaves very little hunting time.  And what if my only 
remaining vacation is Christmas/New Years break (do I need a new permit to 
complete my hunt?).  Most hunters I know visit a site anytime they are able - 
they don't plan it out.
 
If I want to hunt in Holbrook and then go to Gold Basin and Franconia (which I 
and many others do), do I need new permits and environmental surveys for each 
site? If I want to visit Benson, Arizona, Wilcox Playa, Dos Cabezas and then 
skip over to New Mexico, I'm leaving the State (which requires new permit 
applications).
 
This is not a commercial activity, like a mine where you schedule activities 
decades out.  The site the BLM directs us to for examples of how applications 
will be applied, example timelines and how the regulations are applied, is a 
site that discusses pipeline projects, solar farms, cell towers sites, etc.
 
This is not put in place to govern meteorite collecting; it will be used to 
deter "commercial" (hobby) hunting and legitimate commercial hunting.  67% of 
Federal land is closed to mine exploration.  I'd say ~50% is closed to metal 
detecting.  Why do they want to restrict even more land available for us to 
hunt?
 
Worst yet, this will drive meteorites more underground.  Important scientific 
data will be lost to a greater degree.  Locations will be faked more than ever 
before.  With the criminalization of U.S. meteorites, people may be less 
inclined to trade fresh material for U.S. material.  Are pre-2012 meteorites 
grandfathered, or will all American meteorites be suspect?  Even with proper 
papers from an institution, it can be expensive to prove yourself innocent (as 
this will be an environmental infraction, GUPI rules apply and good luck 
winning an EAJA case).
 
This is not like other commercial activities, where I have exclusive use.  If I 
have a lode mining claim, nobody else is allowed to prospect or metal detect.  
If I have a quarry or boulder business, nobody can collect at my site.  If I 
have grazing rights, nobody else can run cattle.  If I have a study site, 
nobody can disturb anything.  Fuel wood permit, etc. etc.  My permit 
doesn't exclude limitless others from trying their luck, even if I 
spend $thou$and$ for the right to hunt an area.
 
If this is based on long-standing policies, why are there so many unanswered 
questions?
 
These are some of the basic reasons it bothers me.  There are others, but I've 
gone too long already.
 
Best wishes to you and all readers,

Mark
 
 

________________________________
From: Norm Lehrman <[email protected]>
To: Jim Wooddell <[email protected]>; Meteorite List 
<[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2012 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New BLM regs: Tempest in a teacup?

Jim & all,

Commercial users always had to have permits.  Permits always took their 
time. This is not new  Rockhounders were always prohibited from commercial 
endeavors.  This is not new.  Meteorite hunters were lumped in with 
rockhounders 
until now. The only real change that I can see is the change in poundage 
limits---a major change for sure, but how many of us have had years where the 
10 
pound limit would've been a problem?  It can happen, but quite rarely.  I have 
recovered hundreds of meteorite (fragments) in Nevada, but nowhere near 10 
pounds per year.  Probably the main point of all this is that we are now under 
scrutiny and attracting explicit personalized regulation where before we were 
pretty much under the radar.  However, the "new" explicit meteorite regulations 
are mostly not new, but rather, a formal restatement of long-standing policies 
governing rockhounding on BLM-managed lands.

Norm



----- Original Message ----
From: Jim Wooddell <[email protected]>
To: Meteorite List <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, October 1, 2012 4:38:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] New BLM regs: Tempest in a teacup?

Hello Norm,

I beleive that was 25 pounds a day, now 10 pounds a year.

Science and Commerical users now require permits.  Casual hunters not
allowed to sell.  Hmmm.  Permit processes can take 185 days.
I'd say that's significant.

Jim


On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Count Deiro <[email protected]> wrote:
> Sorry Norm. Your take on the BLM being some kind of begnign overseer who will 
>look the other way couldn't be farther from the truth. Just wait till the next 
>highly publicized fall amd someone admits to picking up something significant 
>from public land. The BLM will be all over him/her like white on a golf ball. 
>What! No permit? Didn't know this land was restricted? Gimme that! Here! Take 
>this citation!
>
> Guido
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: Norm Lehrman <[email protected]>
>>Sent: Sep 30, 2012 8:17 PM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: [meteorite-list] New BLM regs: Tempest in a teacup?
>>
>>All,
>>
>>I have been following this thread with great confusion, and maybe there IS
>>something I don't understand.  Meteorite collecting has previously fallen 
under
>>the general rules of rockhounding, and the new changes merely formalize a
>>specific policy that is no great change from the past rules.  I am quite sure 
I
>>will be hugey chastised for my ignorance.  Please correct me if I missed
>>something.
>>
>>The previous rules said 25 pounds and/or  one rock.  Now it's 10 pounds and no
>>provision for the big one with respect to meteorites.  How often will that
>>actually afect us?  Almost never.  The use of motorized vehicles off marked
>>roads is also a general policy, not just for us.  Metal detectors are 
>explicitly
>>allowed.  Surely a magnet on a stick is also still fine.
>>
>>Commercial exploitation of BLM ground is subject to a long standing guideline.
>>Find a monster?  It is only fair that the land-owner (all Americans) should 
get
>>some benefit.  This is no change.  If you want to harvest building stones or
>>ornamental boulders, you pay a fee.  We will too.  No real change.
>>
>>I see no great disaster here.  Just a formalization of a specific policy, 
>thanks
>>(?)  to our own loud self-promotion in its various forms.  Of course they had 
>to
>>get explicit.  It is not much more than a clear, specific, restatement of the
>>rules we were all subject to before now.  Or did no one understand this?  Yes,
>>they may choose to make their point by prosecuting someone, but I will be 
>amazed
>>if this involves changes in the law.  Just enforcement of those already 
extant.
>>At worst with fairly minor changes.
>>
>>Have at it.  I am waiting to be reprimanded for my folly.  What am I missing?
>>
>>Best,
>>Norm (http://www.tektitesource.com/)
>>______________________________________________
>>
>>Visit the Archives at 
>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
>>Meteorite-list mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
>
> ______________________________________________
>
> Visit the Archives at 
>http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
> Meteorite-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



-- 
Jim Wooddell
[email protected]
928-247-2675
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



 
They're not treating this like a rockhound fee site where you pay a fixed fee.  
Costs and exact regulations are left up to each district.  And while metal 
detectors are allowed in general, there is no guarantee they will be.  Adam 
Hupe was told by the BLM that metal detectors and magnet sticks are not allowed 
at Ivanpah Dry Lake.  Is this lake different than other dry lakes?
______________________________________________

Visit the Archives at http://www.meteoritecentral.com/mailing-list-archives.html
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to