The horse is dead! Long live the horse!
-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Ford <[email protected]> >Sent: Apr 11, 2014 4:52 AM >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock > >Sorry that should read: Phil and List, > >m. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark Ford >Sent: 11 April 2014 09:51 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock > >Chris and list, > >No need for personal attacks. - After all wasn't it your good self that said >about 'dowsing' many years ago: > >>>"First off, let me say that all you naysaying dowser denialists need >>>to get off your high horses, come down from your ivory towers and >>>>enter the realm of simple, reproducible, empirical evidence-based >>>experimental scientific methodology ... > > >So where's the [scientific] evidence that the video is fake or not fake? - >Let's face it, it looks too good to be true BUT we just can't tell! > > > >m. > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joshua Tree >Earth & Space Museum >Sent: 10 April 2014 19:42 >To: Meteorite list >Subject: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock > >Chris, > >You need to install and tune up a bullshit detector. You seem awfully >gullible. Plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis? Maybe to a moron. > > >Phil Whitmer > >Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum > >-------------------------------------------- > >Then you need to tune up your analysis skills. And your knowledge of >meteoritics. The video was not falsified, and is hardly "phony". What it shows >is plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis. Many, perhaps most >meteorite falls are not preceded by a significant fireball, and even fewer by >acoustics of any sort. > >I don't hear many people saying there's a "reasonable chance" this could be a >meteorite. I didn't even hear much of that early on. Only that nothing >obviously excludes this from being a meteorite. That's a distinction well >worth remembering. If this had been trivially rejected from the beginning, no >analysis would have been performed, and that would be unfortunate. > >And that's getting real. > >Chris > >______________________________________________ > >Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >Meteorite-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >______________________________________________ > >Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >Meteorite-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list >______________________________________________ > >Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com >Meteorite-list mailing list >[email protected] >http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list ______________________________________________ Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
