Nah. It ain't dead until Art sings!
Ed ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Teague" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 9:47 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
The horse is dead! Long live the horse!
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Ford <[email protected]>
Sent: Apr 11, 2014 4:52 AM
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
Sorry that should read: Phil and List,
m.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mark
Ford
Sent: 11 April 2014 09:51
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
Chris and list,
No need for personal attacks. - After all wasn't it your good self that
said about 'dowsing' many years ago:
"First off, let me say that all you naysaying dowser denialists need
to get off your high horses, come down from your ivory towers and
enter the realm of simple, reproducible, empirical evidence-based
experimental scientific methodology ... >
So where's the [scientific] evidence that the video is fake or not
ake? - Let's face it, it looks too good to be true BUT we just can't
tell!
m.
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joshua
Tree Earth & Space Museum
Sent: 10 April 2014 19:42
To: Meteorite list
Subject: [meteorite-list] Fake Norway Rock
Chris,
You need to install and tune up a bullshit detector. You seem awfully
gullible. Plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis? Maybe to a
moron.
Phil Whitmer
Joshua Tree Earth & Space Museum
--------------------------------------------
Then you need to tune up your analysis skills. And your knowledge of
meteoritics. The video was not falsified, and is hardly "phony". What it
shows is plausibly explained by the meteorite hypothesis. Many, perhaps
most meteorite falls are not preceded by a significant fireball, and even
fewer by acoustics of any sort.
I don't hear many people saying there's a "reasonable chance" this could
be a meteorite. I didn't even hear much of that early on. Only that
nothing obviously excludes this from being a meteorite. That's a
distinction well worth remembering. If this had been trivially rejected
from the beginning, no analysis would have been performed, and that would
be unfortunate.
And that's getting real.
Chris
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
