I agree with everything you stated with the exception of response 2 where you state private citizens can profit from meteorite finds here in the United States. It is against federal and most state laws to use meteorites found on public land for commercial purposes meaning that the finder is not allowed to sell anything they find. Private citizen are prohibited from making a profit without a permit which will never be issued.


2) If private citizens were prohibited from profiting from the recovery of meteorites, would you expect a negative impact on the quantity of recovered material from a new fall? I think this is undeniable, and therefore it certainly follows that the total mass deposited with accredited institutions would suffer. And it's not just the quantity, it's the quality. A meteorite recovered within 24 hours of a fall is obviously more scientifically valuable than one recovered a month later, when terrestrial weathering has altered some rare minerals, and short-lived radioisotopes have
decayed below the threshold of detectability.


----- Original Message ----- From: "Matson, Rob D. via Meteorite-list" <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
To: <meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com>
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2016 12:12 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Case study: Lake Eyre meteorite vs. U.S.


Hi Ian,

Since you brought up the Creston fall, presumably as a comparison example against current Australian state policies, I feel some counter-commentary is appropriate.

Creston is a example of where things went a bit pair shaped in my mind for science.

In my opinion, Creston was really no stranger than Sutter's Mill, Novato, Battle Mountain,
Mifflin or Ash Creek. Science has been well served by all of these falls.

USA had a private network of cameras setup that captured the fireball, a private individual and some others extracted that meteorite, the first piece(s) was then on sold. Finally it was sold for a ridiculous price. Not illegal or immoral......just not ideal

I think what you are getting at is that only a small fraction of each of these falls made
it into the hands of researchers. There are a couple points to consider:

(1) How much material do researchers really need to extract the majority of pertinent scientific data from a fall? Sure, if you had infinite time you'd love to have all of it since the individual meteorites from a fall are not necessarily homogenous. (Case in point: Almahata Sitta). But balanced against this is the question of how much more you're
going to learn by analyzing all of the stones from an L6 fall.

(2) If private citizens were prohibited from profiting from the recovery of meteorites, would you expect a negative impact on the quantity of recovered material from a new fall? I think this is undeniable, and therefore it certainly follows that the total mass deposited with accredited institutions would suffer. And it's not just the quantity, it's the quality. A meteorite recovered within 24 hours of a fall is obviously more scientifically valuable than one recovered a month later, when terrestrial weathering has altered some rare minerals, and short-lived radioisotopes have
decayed below the threshold of detectability.

(3) Successful meteorite recovery requires a significant skill set AND considerable expenditures of time and money. In the U.S., I expect that more than 95% of the annual resources made available through government grants to recover meteorites goes to ANSMET. I've spent thousands of unpaid hours on the analysis of nearly all U.S. falls that have occurred in the last 15 years, as well as a number of falls outside America, and have devoted a not insignificant amount of time and money
traveling to many of these places to recover meteorites. On each of these
expeditions I tend to encounter the same couple dozen of dedicated individuals -- names that would all be familiar to anyone on the Meteorite List. On occasion I have seen other scientists "in the field," but I suspect in most cases it was on their own dime and not in an official paid capacity. Meteoriticists are paid to analyze
meteorites, not run around the country recovering them.

Now in Australia, we do have an likely issue of finds being hidden ( old falls and cold finds) due to our state laws. However this material will just add to the 50,000 stones we need to know more about. Where these laws are a benefit is that when our DFN etc detects a fall, scientists (not private hunters looking for profit or cost
recovery) will go out grab the stone and bring it back!

Perhaps in Australia this happens. I have not seen evidence that this is the case in the U.S. Researchers have access to the same information that I do: Doppler radar, seismic networks, all-sky cameras, internet posts, the AMS website and a dozen other resources. Nothing other than time and funding is stopping them
from competing with private citizens.

We will know where it came from, where it landed, who found it, what it is and where it will stay exactly. With much more than just a classification but, rare orbit
data - which is contributing greatly to mapping our solar system and more!

Well, we got all of that on both Sutter's Mill and Creston, in spite of the problems of private land ownership and considerably harder searching conditions than the almost ideal surfaces of the Australian outback. So both systems can work. I just think the current U.S. laws favor a higher success rate than in Australia because
they (at least currently) provide enough incentive to boost the people-hours
that get devoted to each fall.

Best wishes,
Rob

______________________________________________

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________

Visit our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/meteoritecentral and the 
Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
https://pairlist3.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to