I would like to note that people need to learn a
little about how to describe their meteorites. I have been perusing ebay, and I
note so many flawed descriptions.
People are either 1, trying to deceive, or 2, just
clueless about what they have.
For instance, Steve Arnold list a piece of Orissa
that broke off of his larger piece, then calling it a "complete individual".
People, this is a fragment, NOT an individual. An individual is a complete
piece, or almost complete, where you can see it was completely covered in fusion
crust, or if broken, you can see that it is nearly complete, not a broken off
fragment from a much larger piece.
Casper used to pull the same crap, describing complete individuals then selling you fragments with a scrap of crust. Another problem I see alot is "oriented".
Most of the stones I see on ebay described as
oriented never were, nor even begin to look oriented. To be oriented, it needs
to clearly show that it maintained a particular flight orientation, and in doing
so will show flow lines in one direction, usually the backside is flat and
lipped. Some of the boxy pieces that I see as oriented on ebay could not be
further from the truth.
We need to clear this up and jump on these people
who take liberty to trump up the pieces they are selling with false claims.
Mike Farmer
|
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on meteorite descrip... Michael Farmer
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on meteorite de... Jim Strope
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on meteorit... Michael Farmer
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on mete... M come Meteorite Meteorites
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on meteorite de... Michel Franco
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on meteorit... Jim Strope
- Re: [meteorite-list] Note on mete... Michel Franco