Dear Bob, and Thomas, I agree! Dave F. snowbound
Bob Holmes wrote:
Thomas and All-
I agree. With top posting there is no need for editing. If a review of the last message is desired, it is very quick to scroll down a few lines. If no such review is needed, top posting is all the quicker.
Bob
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Please edit messages
Sterling and list, I actually think it is better to have the most recent message at the top as the most pertinent information for that post would be what you see first. If you didn't see the earlier posts then you can scroll down to read them. Thomas H. Webb
--- "Sterling K. Webb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Darren Garrison wrote: > Top posting is generally looked on rather negatively.
I never thought about there being any existing protocol (i.e., my ignorance), but I use Netscape for mail and have for about eight years. In Netscape, top posting is the default setting for replies. I just used it as it came. What about other mail programs?
Sterling K. Webb
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
