Dear chondritists;
I thought I would chime in a moment. Our oolites that are calcium carbonate acretions have layering and concentric structures. After the silica replaces the calcium carbonate, they are quite interesting, hard and worthy of thin slice work.
Dave F.





Norman Lehrman wrote:

Gerald, Tracy & list,

Sorry for the slow reply.  I'm out in the field, and
probably have no business responding anyway, but your
question is an interesting one.  I have worked with
lots of accretionary lapilli in volcanic settings all
over the world.  Like Tracy said, I also know of no
chondrules with truly equivalent concentric structure.

However, the general idea of accretionary dust-balls
and condensates in the solar nebula is appealing. What we would need to do to make the resulting
sphereoids match observations is recrystallization by
one means or another. Many chondrules consist of
single minerals. It might even make sense for some
of the armoring that we see to result from misfit
impurities being expelled from the growing crystal to
its exterior rim.


Understand that my comments are a gross speculation
based on terrestrial knowledge. I have virtually no
familiarity with published chondrule research, so I'm
sure there are others on the list that can offer
better answers.


That said, I would reaffirm that the mental image
suggested by accretionary lapilli is intuitively very
appealing. It must've been something analogous---

Regards,
Norm
(http://tektitesource.com)

--- Gerald Flaherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] a question about
chondrules
I'm reposting this as I received only one response. Please reply if you have any thoughts on this question. Thanks a lot in
advance3.


ON THE ORIGIN OF CHONDRULES
Norm and List,
Please excuse my ignorance for putting forth this

question but as a

relative "newbe" to meteorite collecting, I hope

you will entitle me to

this query.
I came across the term "accretionary lapilli" also

called "volcanic

pisolites" in Dorothy Ferris Lapidus 1987 edition

of "The Facts on File

Dictionary of Geology and Geophysics.
If you bear with me I'll quote " these are

shperoidal concentrically

layered pellets composed mainly of vitric dust and

ash, usually between 2

and 10 mm in diameter. They are formed primarily

through the accretion of

ash and dust by condensed moisture in eruption

clouds. Formless nuclei of

coarse particles fall through the fine debris and

acquire shells of

progressively finer ash. These concentric shells

indicate the increasiing

temperature and decreasing humidity of the cloud

at lower levels.

My question is, does the process described above

provide any

anology("something similar but different") to the

origin of chondrules.

A solar nebula is obviously different than a

volcano but is there any

analagous sympatico to the spheroidal shape?
I've seen neither a macro nor micro view of a

cross-section of a

chondrule so I can't speak to the issue of

concentric layering.

Please excuse this question if it either "offers a

keen grasp of the

obvious" or is so "out of the ballpark",

"continent", "planet", "sun

(star) system", "gallaxy" (that's as limiting as

my current unaided memory

allows my imagination to propel itself).
Thank you for your indulgence.
Jerry Flaherty

>> Meteorite-list mailing list

[email protected]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected]

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to