David, Please do not put words in my mouth. I stand by my description as it was written with the exception of the additional Antarctic piece. Maybe I will start removing all references to Antarctic pieces in the future since they are unobtainable to collectors anyway.
Adam ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Ad - Outstanding Specimens Ending This Afternoon -MUST SEE! > Hello Adam, > > I guess Jeff Grossman changed his mind and accepted NWA 2918 as a > legitimate 3.0 or 3.05 using his stricter techniques. Congratulations. > I'll still sit on the sideline and watch for awhile before changing the > classification back to 3.0 on my website. Thanks for supplying the > additional information from Ted Bunch; sometimes your description > contains errors and I have a hard time distinguishing what I should > accept as fact. For example you state "The only other perfect 3.0 > [besides Colony] is an Antarctic piece named ALH 77307, which is not > available to the public." Actually Jeff told you that Yamato 81020 is > also a 3.0, as your link to the MetBul shows. So now there are four 3.0 > CO chondrites, considering a single decimal place. > > Regards, > David ______________________________________________ Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
