My last post on the subject,
I just had a lengthy conversation with Dr. Bunch just as few minutes ago
about the non-paired stones NWA 1839/3133.
Some statements made by Dr. Bunch:
He absolutely and unequivocally disagrees with David Weir's last post the
List.
He has access to the latest data and it in no way supports a pairing between
the two.
Dr Bunch's exact quote "The petrography, mineral chemistry and oxygen
isotopes clearly indicate that NWA 1839 and NWA 3133 are NOT paired, period!
bingo!"
I don't think it could be stated much clearer than that,
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Weir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adam Hupe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, October 15, 2006 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] [ebay] ending in about 2 days
Adam Hupe wrote:
Stan,
Let it go, you are absolutely wrong, again. Like I told David Weir,
contact Dr. Bunch yourself about NWA 3133 and report back to the List
your findings. Read the archives, it is all in there.
Hello Adam,
Thanks for inviting me into your debate. All I have to say is that I am
100% convinced that 3133 IS paired to 1839. This data IS NOT contained in
the List archives, but I have a copy of it. Dr. Bunch has already been
contacted and supplied this new data. Although he claims only to be a
messenger, he has graciously taken it upon himself to arrange for new
isotopic tests to be performed in light of this new irrefutable data (my
words not his). If you are patient you will eventually know that these
stones are paired. I will not supply you with my forensic data at least
until you supply the List with yours, that which supports the hypothesis
against such a pairing. Have a great day, I need to cook dinner.
David
meteoritestudies.com
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
