Sonny,
this is not harassment.
Like I wrote to you before its simply an opinion of a writer writing his
article.
The last Nevada find was thought of a find from John Blennert.
If you see it as an harassment, I am sorry, which I also told you before.
I am not Bob V.s parrot, but as a Californian meteorite hunter I would like
to have other hunters coming into this state help the hunters that are on
these dry lakes for number of years, logging all the finds and numbering
them as well to have the TKW for the areas and the different classifications
for the different finds on the lakes.
I think you are right that one could get numbers or no numbers if this is
the Nom rules, when you think it is the time, but getting numbers to keep
things a bit in order doesn't tell anyone that you hunt there, it is only
known by Rhian Jones, which is kept in strictest confidence.
It does help out the hunters here in California and there are more than just
Bob.
And just like Bob, you wouldn't'f feel so harassed by him, if you wouldn't
want things to be the way you are wanting them to be.
Your way.
Two opinions and that is the way it goes.
So no parrot on Bob's back, just my opinion coming from California where
things are done a bit different than Arizona.
Happy hunting,
Moni
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] New information from Nomenclature re:
provisionalnames and numbers
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:24:28 -0400
Dear List,
I am sending this email in response to an ongoing thread regarding
provisional names and numbers for new finds. I hope this puts an end to the
thread. I have contacted the Nomenclature regarding this issue and received
the following response.
Dear Sonny,
Thanks for your phone message as well as this email.
You can look up the committee membership and the rules and guidelines
on the Meteoritical Society website.
The Committee has no requirements regarding getting provisional
numbers within a fixed time. In fact there is no requirement to get a
provisional >number at all. If you want to just submit a meteorite at the
time it is classified that is fine. Similarly, there is no time requirement
for submitting a >new find. When fragments are clearly paired it is fine to
include them all in the same number.
I hope this clarifies things.
I hope this will end the harassment from Mr. Bob Verish and Team Verish. As
you can see I have done nothing wrong in the delay of getting provisonal
numbers and names for all of my new finds. I have chosen to complete field
study work before aquiring any provisional names or numbers.
Below is an excerpt from one of Bob's emails.
Guess I'm just jealous that Sonny gets to do things
his way, and I'm forced to abide by "guidelines".
http://www.meteorite-times.com ( Nevada Picture Of The Day) The last 2
months have been focused negativley on my finds.
Thanks,
Sonny
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free
from AOL at AOL.com.
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
_________________________________________________________________
Need a break? Find your escape route with Live Search Maps.
http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag3
______________________________________________
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
