Well Pete,  Friable of course are eggs 'n bacon... And slickensides come from 
the bacon grease...  Ok-- couldn't resist.

Friable: in the geological sense, means brittle to the point of being easily 
crumbled. This is the term we use to describe rock "fabric" which is so poorly 
consolidated, poorly cemented, or extensively exsolved,  that it can be crushed 
with the strength of one's hand. Burbojole(sp) is a classic friable meteorite 
which was recovered from several meters of mud underneath sea ice.  Amazing 
integrity for such penetration, it would seem.  Did Carancus become friable as 
a result of impact? The tenstile/crushing test were quiet variable( 2-62Mp) I 
haven't seen the thin section studies.

Slickenside: A structure/zone that lies on/between a fault/slippage face which 
may be striated, grooved, polished or, all of the above.  It may contain "rock 
flour" or secondary minerals from the physical, then chemical, alteration of 
the zone. The term adopted from the german use. What I believe I know about 
slickenside formation is that it is a lengthy process" both in time and 
displacement. (≤ few minutes to seconds vs ≥ few miliseconds).

The conclusions in the Carancus report, if true, might tend to lessen the 
difference between formations of slickensides and shock veins. Who am I to 
challenge a peer-reviewed publication---but I have reservations. Remember it 
was not a lot of physical analysis so much as computer modeling.

 I still don't see a shock veins forming striations, owing that their primary 
forming process was hitherto understood to be pooling of flash-melted olivine 
shifting to the high pressure polymorph: ringwoodite under mantle level 
pressures(as an example). PDF--planar deformation features aka shocked quartz 
was recovered from the impact soil but those can form and far lower pressures 
then needed to form ringwoodite.

  Seems almost every piece I saw had slickensides and unless there was a 
sampling error, I also have reservations that Carancus was not extensively 
chocked full of slickensides at entry. (See also Zag A for slickensides) 
Fragmentation seemed to slightly favor rupturing along slickensides but 
breaking across them was common also. If they had they formed at impact, seems 
they would all have favored breaking along the slickenside surfaces.

 Do the slickensides of Carancus contain glass, indicating that they could have 
healed the surfaces giving back some strength? (There is a Doctorial thesis in 
thee somewhere). Dating the slickensides would also shed light on whether they 
formed at impact or in some past collision on a parent body. 

If there was no containment--as in a disintegrating mass, then seems to me that 
there would be no slipping-- just crumbling.  I would like to see some research 
on the composition and structure of the slickensides to know how old they were 
and how hot the faces got. Weighing what we know, they are old not new.

Funny but it is conceivable that the Carancus slickenside could represent a 
unique internal fusion  ahem crust..er feature.

Elton


--- On Fri, 6/20/08, Pete Shugar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone please define for me the two terms: friable and
> slickensides?
> Thanks, Pete
______________________________________________
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Reply via email to