> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:49:25 -0700 > From: <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fusion Crusted "Meteoroids" > > DARREN, > THERE YOU GO AGAIN RAMBLEING WITH YOUR WORTHLESS AND SARCASTIC INFORMATION. > ---- Darren Garrison <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:39:27 -0700, you wrote: > > > > >Further when you look up into space there are a > > >gazzillion sources of crust producing bodies. > > > > No, there are not. There is a very small number, definable as the number of > > planets and moons with an appreciable atmosphere. Are you suggesting that > > other > > stars could be making fusion crusts on meteoroids in this solar system? > OTHER PLANETS NOT STARS. YOU SIMPLY DON'T KNOW EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU DO! > > > > >And look at the age of most meteorites. It seem to > > >me 4.56 billion years gives these space travelers > > >plenty of time to have visited enough places to pick > > >up fusion crusts here and there. > > > > The original formation of the solar system was 4.56 billion years ago. > > However, > > the lifetime of individual small meteoroids is much, much shorter than that. > IS IT REALLY? THEN WHY DO WE CONSIDER THESE METEORITES ARE THE AGE THEY ARE > WHICH IS IN THE 4.5 BILLION YEAR RANGE? DO YOU REALLY NOT KNOW HOW OLD > METEORITES ARE? AGAIN, READ ANY OF NORTON'S BOOKS. > > > > >I earlier went on to theorize that perhaps this pre-fusion > > >crust might actually help protect the material and up the > > >odds of a safe landing here on earth. ( Yes it becomes > > >a heat shield and helps protect the material at least enough > > >to salvage some of the material.) > > > > A heat shield must be made of a material with a melting point higher than > > that > > of the material being protected, or else a thick enough layer that it would > > not > > all be ablated away before slowing down. A thin fusion crust of the same > > material the rest of the meteoroid is made from would not act as a heat > > shield. > YES A MELTED COMBINATION OF ALL OF THESE MATERIALS WOULD BE STRONGER THAN > IT'S ORIGINAL INDIVIDUAL PARTS. AND WE HAVE NO IDEA HOW THICK OR THIN THIS > EARLY CRUST MIGHT BE DO WE? IT MAY START OUT SEVERAL INCHES THICK. WE SIMPLY > HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING. AGAIN , WE CAN ONLY GUESS. > > > > >This only makes sense because we all know that some finds > > >and falls simple have NO crust at all. > > > > It makes sense to say that some meteoroids have a fusion crust heat shield > > that > > protects them from ablating during atmospheric entry because we find some > > meteorites with no fusion crust... > FIGURE IT OUT DARREN, YOU ARE NOT THAT STUPID. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEANT BUT YOU > WOULD RATHER BE AN A SS. WE ALL KNOW YOU BY NOW. > CARL > > ______________________________________________ > > http://www.meteoritecentral.com > > Meteorite-list mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
