Hello Larry, I was the one that put "dust bunnies" in the discussion mix whilst discussion space weathering color changes to meteoroids.
I was using it generically and did not limit it to particles which were neutral in charge and gravitationaly emplaced. I was thinking in terms that there are particles that are magnetic/polarized/ionized and are buzzing about the asteroid on or near the surface. I am comfortable that TC3 was not likely a major dust collector. We are in further agreement that the quality of the spectral measurements have yet to be explained/validated publicly. Given "chondridic pallesite" proclaimations by novice but "credentialed" researchers in the past I'd like to know that more than a few novice eyes were looking over the researchers work. Someone asked earlier about nanodiamond formation re: Carbonaceous Chondrites. I wanted to point out for listeners that Urelites and some CCs already contain nanodiamonds and impact is not necessary for nanodiamond to be found on the terrain. Elton --- On Wed, 3/25/09, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] One of the best of the 2008 TC3 articles > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Date: Wednesday, March 25, 2009, 7:24 PM > Hi everone: > > As someone who has studied asteroids, this is great news. > > Only two comments: > > 1. I am a little concerned with the classification of the > "asteroid" as F. The spectral range is not perfect and I wonder what the > uncertainty of the spectrum is (might be very poor quality at the longer > wavelengths). > 2. I do not think that 2008 TC 3 was "dusty." It > was tumbling in space and spinning once ever 50 to 100 seconds. An object > this size is not going to have a dusty surface! > > my two cents > > Larry ______________________________________________ http://www.meteoritecentral.com Meteorite-list mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
